.

ליב צו וויסן האט געשריבן:פארוואס די העק איז די שמועס אין ענגליש????
ונהפך הוא זעהט אויס צו האבן נאר או ענגלישע קי באורד... אבער מי אני און רביה"ק, אין ענגליש איז דא גענוג אזעלכע שמועסן... פארוואס נישט שרייבן אין אידיש?

וואס א חילוק?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

If it’s a rational epistemological method for ascertaining “knowledge” in that regard, and there is inherently no avenue for evidentiary claims or counterclaims (which can be conceded has more warrant), is that not reason enough? You can advance a Wittgensteinian argument “Whereof one cannot speak,...

It may provide the Avenue, but why would it provide a reason?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

[. I never tried to imply "1)". And for the second one, your whole idea relies around the accuracy of reformed epistemology, and not evidentialism, which I fail to see the reason for. True. Though, as mentioned, evidentialism itself is ultimately lacking in regard to metaphysical claims; ...

Right, but if I just look for meaning myself, then it's a even bigger conformation bias hodge podge, let me live with abit less hodge podge. Ok, at least your'e not confused anymore and you now have the clarity that you're looking for meaning and not for facts If only I was actually clear by myself...

[d ]No, it does. You're talking about possible answers(like the possibility to redefine "revelation"), not concrete answers. The only reason to KNOW it's true is because of your already existing belief, which is, as you said, a form of belief perseverance. There seem to be two disparate a...

Right, but if I just look for meaning myself, then it's a even bigger conformation bias hodge podge, let me live with abit less hodge podge. Ok, at least your'e not confused anymore and you now have the clarity that you're looking for meaning and not for facts If only I was actually clear by myself...

Ok, so if that's the question then you can look at the world however and whichever way you want, philosophy and theology is just bs confirmation bias hodge podge from very smart and educated white men, as it says in the verse: Philosophy is just white guys j**king off Right, but if I just look for ...

Don't you see for yourself that you're dealing with people who are more concerned with the perseverance of their beliefs than with the objective truth? What kind of a question is this "Why don't you try to look past your biases"?! They don't want to look past their biases because they wan...

רביה''ק זי''ע האט געשריבן:Because that precisely how you become an apikoros

And that's precisely how you don't answer a question.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

In short, “Revelation” is seemingly what grounds one’s commitment to “G-d’s” (for lack of a better term) commandments. However, this itself is seemingly fraught with difficulties owing to the aforementioned non-cognitivism etc. associated with language in reference to G-d. Thus, in order to avoid t...

In short, “Revelation” is seemingly what grounds one’s commitment to “G-d’s” (for lack of a better term) commandments. However, this itself is seemingly fraught with difficulties owing to the aforementioned non-cognitivism etc. associated with language in reference to G-d. Thus, in order to avoid t...

Can I clarify what you need to (re)define?

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

כ'האב עס דארט אונטערגעלאנט אז מען וויל נישט, עכ"פ לפי הרמב"ם (בח"ג פט"ז), אונטערמינעווען דעם פארשטאנד פון "טוב" לגביו כביכול פון אונזער פערסעפשאן און הגדרה פון וואס "טוב" מיינט: א "מאראלישער" סארט "טוב". ס'איז אבער נישט מאראל צו אריינלייגן...

On your first paragraph, if you concede that we can't think of God in a logical way, then there's no way to know if we should follow him. We don't even know what he wants/needs us to do, because we're thinking of "want"/"need" in a logical way. Like I said, the Theological Non-C...

But I still want to have a answer.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

Like I said, a tautology. "Infinite" with regard to power". Though, it seems superfluous to the argument you're advancing. Namely, if He's not omnipotent then maybe there's a being with greater power. I don't see a reason to include a clause of infinity in the argument Right[emoji106...

Second, it's essence is infinite, if not, then someone could have created god.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

Please explain how: ~Not omnipotent → Not infinite I don’t see how it necessarily follows. I don’t claim it’s a non-sequitur, I just don’t understand. Unless it’s with regard to power. In which case it’d seem to be a tautology : “not a nfinite in . (This is all the more so if we don’t deny Omni...

If it is conceded and agreed that Free Will is an intrinsic good per se and that it outweighs the evils that inevitably arise due to said freedom of choice, then it can be argued that creating Free Will [the “Good”] without the subsequent evils that arise due to its utilization is an internal and l...

לויט די אידישע רעליגיע דינט מען אים נישט ווייל מען "וויל" (און מען פארשטייט אים...), נאר ווייל מען "מוז". און דעם "מוז" קען מען זאגן איז ענליך צום "מוז" פארוואס מען "מוז" זיך אויפירן מאראליש (אפילו אָן אן עוואלושינערי/ציוויליזאציע פערספעקטיוו) צו וו...

If God is good and infinitely powerful, and everything he did is because of his goodness, then why did he create evil? Why is there a hell? Why can we feel pain? [emoji848][emoji848][emoji848] Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk ווי שטייט אין תנ"ך אז גאט איז כל כולו גוט, און "אלע" ז...