You say before the worlds destruction by feminists. So you think women shouldn't be able to vote, get paid less for the same work, not have their husbands support and presence during labor and child birth? You know that you benefit a lot from this destruction. Aren't you glad they can vote to ensure that the block vote works? I'm honestly curious if all men here think like you.
And what are the benefits of being financially dependent on someone else הקטן? Me thinks financial independence is a good thing. What other benefits did wives have before the destruction ?
i'm not debating any specifics if they should or not vote or be financially independent maybe they should not have to take the pressure of dealing with money , i don't know maybe it is better they should not be drafted to the army or maybe they should maybe they are naturally better caregivers for their children and should remain home maybe not
but if it is true that "men are from mars and women are from venus" should they not have different roles
I want atheism to be true and am made uneasy by the fact that some of the most intelligent and well-informed people I know are religious believers
They should be the ones to decide if they want to fulfill pre defined roles. I take more of an issue with what diff said. He's not marrying a woman for friendship. Does that mean that all he wants is a slave and baby machine? I'm confused.
[left]Why would one want to be with children in a home of equals. It is degrading. And why bring them to such ruined world. My main concern is equality at home although it surely comes from equality in outside matters She is not my pride if she isnt mine, so im paying more than for a slave[/left]
Why is it degrading to be equal in a home of children? Maybe it's degrading for her to be subordinate ? And I'm really confused. What's more than a slave that you're paying for? So she is partially a slave but does more for you than a slave?
venus האט געשריבן:Why is it degrading to be equal in a home of children? Maybe it's degrading for her to be subordinate ? And I'm really confused. What's more than a slave that you're paying for? So she is partially a slave but does more for you than a slave?
?Why are you arguing with this deranged man? Talking about women like they're cattle to be slaughtered. Your pride? slave? ***
I think we both think marriage how it was is a thing from the past. But you call that a destruction. Do you think it's a bad thing? It seems like you wish it wasn't this way while I and most moral people ( I hope) think it's progression.
Oh, געפולטע פוש, I'm just trying to point out how deranged he is. And שמעקעדיג, sorry about the English. It's very hard for me to type in Yiddish. If it's annoying Ill stop posting. I apologize.
It seems that in the progressive countries the percent of (remaining) married people is low, and keeps falling. only the laywers see progress from this At discussion end we will see who is deranged also with what do I need her help
It's not such a bad thing that people are getting out of bad situations? Why should they remain stuck? And the fact that women are more financially independent today gives them the freedom to do this. הלכות גיטין exists for a reason. We're not Christians or Hindus.
There are too many bad situations. Because no man needs a binding female friend. And thats why in the progressive countries the percent of married people is low, and keeps falling. Also Just asking why should men have to pay full child support
With this I’m ending my part of the discussion Thank you it was informative and a pleasure
