געוואלד געשריגן האט געשריבן:I beg to differ. The words may be fancy, but the structure and tone lack class and professionalism. The aim is to make portray him as godlike and portray her as the scum of the earth. The comparison of his apparent squeaky-clean background to her apparent shady past is not in good taste (especially when dragging her family into the picture). This is about molestation, not family and sectual history (pun intended). Now my point here isn't to express my belief that he is 100% guilty, nor am I jumping for joy at his 103 year sentence. However, this is one of the most biased, twisted, and cruel "exposés" (for lack of a better word) that I've read regarding this case. As a side note, the English is still far from perfect (not to brag about my own grammatical prowess chas v'shalom).
קען זיין. כ'האב נאר געקוקט די ערשטע צוויי פאראגראפס, און ס'זעט אויס געשריבן פיל בעסער. כ'האב שוין אפילו געטראכט פון ווערן א מעמבער אין די וועבערמאן קהילה.
געוואלד געשריגן האט געשריבן:I beg to differ. The words may be fancy, but the structure and tone lack class and professionalism. The aim is to make portray him as godlike and portray her as the scum of the earth. The comparison of his apparent squeaky-clean background to her apparent shady past is not in good taste (especially when dragging her family into the picture). This is about molestation, not family and sectual history (pun intended). Now my point here isn't to express my belief that he is 100% guilty, nor am I jumping for joy at his 103 year sentence. However, this is one of the most biased, twisted, and cruel "exposés" (for lack of a better word) that I've read regarding this case. As a side note, the English is still far from perfect (not to brag about my own grammatical prowess chas v'shalom).
קען זיין. כ'האב נאר געקוקט די ערשטע צוויי פאראגראפס, און ס'זעט אויס געשריבן פיל בעסער. כ'האב שוין אפילו געטראכט פון ווערן א מעמבער אין די וועבערמאן קהילה.
געוואלד געשריגן האט געשריבן:I beg to differ. The words may be fancy, but the structure and tone lack class and professionalism. The aim is to make portray him as godlike and portray her as the scum of the earth. The comparison of his apparent squeaky-clean background to her apparent shady past is not in good taste (especially when dragging her family into the picture). This is about molestation, not family and sectual history (pun intended). Now my point here isn't to express my belief that he is 100% guilty, nor am I jumping for joy at his 103 year sentence. However, this is one of the most biased, twisted, and cruel "exposés" (for lack of a better word) that I've read regarding this case. As a side note, the English is still far from perfect (not to brag about my own grammatical prowess chas v'shalom).
קען זיין. כ'האב נאר געקוקט די ערשטע צוויי פאראגראפס, און ס'זעט אויס געשריבן פיל בעסער. כ'האב שוין אפילו געטראכט פון ווערן א מעמבער אין די וועבערמאן קהילה.
Content is more important than grammar.
Butt Gremer end speling ar nut triviyel metters, eyder. (Eye epalegyz four eny vords spelt correktly.)
געפילטע פיש האט געשריבן:וואס זענען די בענעפיטס פון זיין א מעמבער אין קהילת וועבערמאן? מ'באקומט כאטש פרי טעראפי?
כ'האף אז דו פארלאנגסט נישט מ'זאל אויסרעכענען אלע בענעפיטס פון זיין א מעמבער. ווייל ס'איז אי אפשר לפורטם כי רבים הם. און אויך ווייל ס'איז פון די זאכן שאי אפשר להעלותם על הכתב. גוט שבת.
געוואלד געשריגן האט געשריבן:Berl, I don't quite get your point...
although that was impressive
My point is, that if we don't learn to spell words correctly there's no end to the mistakes. And then the message gets twisted as well. In any case, don't take it personally.
balagulah האט געשריבן:Butt Gremer end speling ar nut triviyel metters, eyder. (Eye epalegyz four eny vords spelt correktly.)
[left]Although spelled is usually spelled spelled, somtimes spelt may be spelt spelt. You have therefore inadvertently spelt spelt correctly.[/left]
But you have misspelled "Somtimes". Sometimes we misspell words, inadvertently.
Sometimes we should capitalize 'sometimes', as I just did in my sentence here. However, sometimes we shouldn't capitalize 'sometimes', contrary to what you have inadvertently done in your sentence above.
