נשלח: זונטאג דעצעמבער 26, 2021 12:24 pm
איך וויל נישט מגיב זיין אין דעם אשכול מטעמים מובנים, אבער מענטשן זענען אזוי ווייט פון דאס לעבן פון מנהיגי ישראל... מען דארף זיך אריינלייגן אין זייערע שיך איידער מען איז מגיב.
http://vps9000.inmotionhosting.com/~kavesh6/
http://vps9000.inmotionhosting.com/~kavesh6/viewtopic.php?t=14673
מי אני האט געשריבן:עס איז שוין געווען א מבוכה בימי הביניים...
[/left]The legislative authority ought not at the same time to be the executive or governor; for the governor, as administrator, should stand under the authority of the law, and is bound by it under the supreme control of the legislator. The legislative authority may therefore deprive the governor of his power, depose him, or reform his administration, but not punish him. This is the proper and only meaning of the common saying in England, “The King — as the supreme executive power — can do no wrong.” For any such application of punishment would necessarily be an act of that very executive power to which the supreme right to compel according to law pertains, and which would itself be thus subjected to coercion; which is self-contradictory
אין די לעקציע [7:34-9:38] (וואס מ׳קען טאקע טרעפן אויפ׳ן אינטערנעט…) איז דאס דר. סטיווען סמיט מסביר במשנתו.For it has been already shown that nothing the sovereign representative can do to a subject, on what pretence soever, can properly be called injustice or injury; because every subject is author of every act the sovereign doth [by relinquishing their rights to the sovereign], so that he never wanteth right to any thing, otherwise than as he himself is the subject of God, and bound thereby to observe the laws of nature. And therefore it may and doth often happen in Commonwealths that a subject may be put to death by the command of the sovereign power, and yet neither do the other wrong; as when Jephthah caused his daughter to be sacrificed: in which, and the like cases, he that so dieth had liberty to do the action, for which he is nevertheless, without injury, put to death. And the same holdeth also in a sovereign prince that putteth to death an innocent subject. For though the action be against the law of nature, as being contrary to equity (as was the killing of Uriah by David); yet it was not an injury to Uriah, but to God. Not to Uriah, because the right to do what he pleased was given him by Uriah himself; and yet to God, because David was God's subject and prohibited all iniquity by the law of nature. Which distinction, David himself, when he repented the fact, evidently confirmed, saying, "To thee only have I sinned”