נשלח: מאנטאג יולי 14, 2014 10:37 am
[left]you should consider becoming a stand-up comedian. Today's liberals are the new anti-semites. the KKK is very very small
They had an op-ed article a few months back, written by a liberal professor from Hebrew University, and an Muslim Arab studies professor where they compared Israel to Iran. They claimed that Iran is now turning into a democracy while Israel is quickly becoming a theocracy. In other words, charedi influence in Israel will be just as dangerous as the Ayatollahs in Iran. They are ignoring the obvious difference. "Frum" Muslims blow themselves up to kill Jews, and Orthodox Jews sit and learn Torah. There lies the difference
They also wrote an article this past summer about a teenage Arab who throws rocks at Israeli soldiers, and twisted it in such a way they he looked like the victim
When the three boys HY"D were kidnapped, the Israelis went in and arrested many Arabs. Some teenagers were bombarding the Israelis with rocks, so the soldiers opened fire and one Arab was killed. This was written the day before the Jewish teens were found dead. Anyway they put a picture of this crying Arab woman on the cover. They do this on almost a daily basis. They painted such a disgusting picture of moral equivalency. This woman said that "my son didn't kidnap the boys, but if he did, I would be proud of him." What did Naftali Frankel's mother say? A death is a death, whether it be Jew or Arab. But when you finish reading the article, they make the Arab woman seem more righteous
The New York Times, without shame, wrote these words
Jewish Israelis see Palestinian teens throwing rocks as terrorists who sometimes are killed as a result. Palestinians however, see yeshiva boys as living on occupied land
In other words, a 16 year old kid going to yeshiva is equally guilty as a Palestinian kid throwing rocks at Israelis
There's a difference between holding to a higher standard, and granting legitimacy to the opinion that a Jewish teen deserves death for simply getting up and going to school[/left]
They had an op-ed article a few months back, written by a liberal professor from Hebrew University, and an Muslim Arab studies professor where they compared Israel to Iran. They claimed that Iran is now turning into a democracy while Israel is quickly becoming a theocracy. In other words, charedi influence in Israel will be just as dangerous as the Ayatollahs in Iran. They are ignoring the obvious difference. "Frum" Muslims blow themselves up to kill Jews, and Orthodox Jews sit and learn Torah. There lies the difference
They also wrote an article this past summer about a teenage Arab who throws rocks at Israeli soldiers, and twisted it in such a way they he looked like the victim
When the three boys HY"D were kidnapped, the Israelis went in and arrested many Arabs. Some teenagers were bombarding the Israelis with rocks, so the soldiers opened fire and one Arab was killed. This was written the day before the Jewish teens were found dead. Anyway they put a picture of this crying Arab woman on the cover. They do this on almost a daily basis. They painted such a disgusting picture of moral equivalency. This woman said that "my son didn't kidnap the boys, but if he did, I would be proud of him." What did Naftali Frankel's mother say? A death is a death, whether it be Jew or Arab. But when you finish reading the article, they make the Arab woman seem more righteous
The New York Times, without shame, wrote these words
Jewish Israelis see Palestinian teens throwing rocks as terrorists who sometimes are killed as a result. Palestinians however, see yeshiva boys as living on occupied land
In other words, a 16 year old kid going to yeshiva is equally guilty as a Palestinian kid throwing rocks at Israelis
There's a difference between holding to a higher standard, and granting legitimacy to the opinion that a Jewish teen deserves death for simply getting up and going to school[/left]
